Wage slavery is not something over which to be thankful.
What is Maximum Advantage?
Thursday, November 22, 2012
Saturday, November 17, 2012
Sunday, November 11, 2012
Tuesday, November 06, 2012
Useless Liberals
From Useless Liberal Intellectuals:
I have my set of words and you have yours. When we mean the same things, we can reason together to a conclusion. But suppose there are other people with other meanings for those words. They talk to each other and reach a different outcome. How can the two groups work together? They do not share a common language, and each distrusts the meanings assigned to the words of the other. Worse yet, the deconstruction crowd raises issues about the stability of words used to describe facts, so that even facts are subject to debate.
[...]
Now suppose a group like Occupy wants to make decisions in this theoretical environment. If they fall prey to the academic process of the deconstructionist-poststructuralists, discussing every word, trying to strip out the repressive meanings, and searching for ways to examine every fact, nothing will happen but process. There is no way to make a decision. Even if they start with a good deal of agreement, the process is unwieldy and irritating. And when they get done, how can they use that result to impact the decisions of others? Do they have to repeat the process of masticating every word 50 times every time they add a new person, or attempt to persuade some random person? Thank the heavens they don’t. Confronted with a disaster, they act, as in Red Hook, New York, and Rockaway.
Deconstruction and poststructuralism have proved to be a disaster for participatory democracy. They are a disaster for the public sphere. This is the outcome of the life’s work of academic “liberals” trying to solve the problem of the hegemony of words.
Meanwhile the real hegemony, the hegemony of capitalists and oligarchs, dominates the world, wrecks the global economy, crushes the lives of hundreds of millions of people, and tramples democracy into the ground. Academic liberals wring their hands, but they have nothing to contribute to understanding or a method for change.For the most part, I certainly agree with the author's assertion. The author dies not go far enough in examining why such theories have been allowed to thrive. Ultimately useless intellectuals are a by-product of an academic systems which promotes their stupidity as a means to ensure nothing ever changes. Conservatives are often used as a bogey-man to explain counter-revolutionary impulses in society, but liberals are far more likely to stymie real change. Liberals ensure that nobody does anything but sit around and talk. Therefore nothing ever happens and nothing changes except through reaction (which is the home turf of conservative impulses).
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
No True Nobel Prize in Economics
Although few realize it, the so-called "Nobel Prize in Economics." The creation of the Central Bank of Sweden, it is really the “Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel.” The Nobel family, not to mention real scientists, are appalled that it is given the same billing. From There Is No Nobel Prize in Economics:
Members of the Nobel family are among the harshest, most persistent critics of the economics prize, and members of the family have repeatedly called for the prize to be abolished or renamed. In 2001, on the 100th anniversery of the Nobel Prizes, four family members published a letter in the Swedish paper Svenska Dagbladet, arguing that the economics prize degrades and cheapens the real Nobel Prizes. They aren’t the only ones.
Scientists never had much respect for the new economic Nobel prize. In fact, a scientist who headed Nixon’s Science Advisory Committee in 1969, was shocked to learn that economists were even allowed on stage to accept their award with the real Nobel laureates. He was incredulous: “You mean they sat on the platform with you?”
That hatred continues to simmer below the surface, and periodically breaks through and makes itself known. Most recently, in 2004, three prominent Swedish scientists and members of the Nobel committee published an open letter in a Swedish newspaper savaging the fraudulent “scientific” credentials of the Swedish Central Bank Prize in Economics. “The economics prize diminishes the value of the other Nobel prizes. If the prize is to be kept, it must be broadened in scope and be disassociated with Nobel,” they wrote in the letter, arguing that achievements of most of the economists who win the prize are so abstract and disconnected from the real world as to utterly meaningless.Why the animosity? Because economics is not a real science. It is an ideology that means nothing as to the fundamental structure of the universe. As such, economics does not deserve accolades, only scorn. So the next time you hear someone mentioned as a "Nobel Prize Winner in Economics" you'll know it is a lie, just like their so-call "science."
Monday, October 22, 2012
Real Tragedies
And the worst part about it is that you can't even feel that bad for me, because the Pity Jar of this nation is basically empty; its remaining crumbs reserved for families of five who lost it all when their mortgage imploded, hospital patients who can't pay to keep themselves breathing and the people who've been without power for weeks, or lost their house in a tornado, or are watching their entire livelihood wither under the sun. These are the types of poor souls that get worried about. Those of us lucky enough to have created our own misfortune by allowing our helicopter parents to get under our skin and pump us full of dreams, pursuing misguided MFAs and resisting minimum-wage labor – get out of the way and make room for the real tragedies.
- "Job interviews are fun"
Unemployment Stories Vol 13
Saturday, October 20, 2012
Sunday, October 14, 2012
Election Year Propaganda Links
Every four years I've noted this theme is taken up by some, probably because the constant election year drone of propaganda stimulates the discussion.
Why are Americans so easy to manipulate? Ring the bell and they start to drool.
Manipulated America: One Theory of How They Control US. Control is accepted by legitimacy. The author could benefit by learning about 4GW Theory.
Romney's Rise in Polls vs. Electoral College Map. Not specifically about propaganda, but it shows how the expectations of entertainment influences votes. We elect the jesters. The electoral college does mitigate this tendency a little bit. For example the republicans can pick up 100K votes in Texas, but it does not change anything, because they were going to win Texas anyway.
Why are Americans so easy to manipulate? Ring the bell and they start to drool.
Manipulated America: One Theory of How They Control US. Control is accepted by legitimacy. The author could benefit by learning about 4GW Theory.
Romney's Rise in Polls vs. Electoral College Map. Not specifically about propaganda, but it shows how the expectations of entertainment influences votes. We elect the jesters. The electoral college does mitigate this tendency a little bit. For example the republicans can pick up 100K votes in Texas, but it does not change anything, because they were going to win Texas anyway.
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Tuesday, October 09, 2012
Sunday, September 23, 2012
Sunday, September 09, 2012
Don't Work For Free
I've been neglecting my blogs lately because I've been on a music writing/recording binge. My latest is Don't Work For Free. (It's a little different than my usual.) Check it out, and remember: Don't Work For Free!
Saturday, August 18, 2012
You Are An Ant!
Even if one pulls the strings in the center of the swarm, one is still just an ant.
Or
Pulling the strings
in the middle of the swarm
is still just an ant
Or
Pulling the strings
in the middle of the swarm
is still just an ant
Saturday, August 04, 2012
Deescalate the Fallout
Veteran Seattle cop accused of using excessive force. By provoking an angry mob, especially in an age where everyone's phone is a video recorder, his brazen assaults made every cop on-site a potential target. The next time (and for police there is always a next time), rather than angry words, the crowd may have turned violent. ("Hey, it's those pigs!") By turning in their fellow officer, they are attempting to deescalate the fallout. In a heavily armed society, the next confrontation may potentially involve gunfire. If these actions were in a closed setting, absent an angry mob, the officers would look the other way. Psychos are sometimes useful (few cops really want to be the first cop to kick in a door), so they are tolerated if they can maintain control in public situations.
Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
